Is cryptocurrency a “property” in English case law?
In English case law, does the concept of 'cryptocurrency' fall under the category of 'property'? Given the digital and decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies, it's a complex question that requires delving into the nuances of property rights, ownership, and legal precedents. Does the law consider cryptocurrencies as tangible assets, intellectual property, or something entirely different? Are there any landmark cases that have established a precedent in this domain? How are courts and regulators approaching this rapidly evolving field, and what challenges remain in clearly defining cryptocurrencies' legal status as property?